James C. Moore

112 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

James C. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
  • General Decision Sciences 73
  • Pharmacy 74
  • Economics and Econometrics 424
  • Management Science and Operations Research 186
  • General Psychology 19
Replace Ralph A. Alexander with:
Ralph A. Alexander United States
Mandeep K. Dhami United Kingdom
Eva E. Chen United States
Jonathan Schulz United States
Clifford R. Mynatt United States
Michael E. Doherty United States
Dan Simon United States
Kathleen M. Galotti United States
Ulrich Keller Germany
Jason Stanley United States
James C. Moore relative to Ralph A. Alexander United States Ralph A. Alexander's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18.5×
Ralph A. Alexander · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James C. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Moore. The network helps show where James C. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James C. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James C. Moore Line = papers co-authored together James C. Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 122 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976194
2 1968144
3 2013103
4 1994100
5 197894
6 198683
7 198768
8 199264
9 201259
10 200654
11
Facility familiarity and the home advantage.
199542
12 197337
13
Spectator effect on team performance in college basketball.
199336
14 197235
15 200733
16 201433
17 197930
18 201429
19 201329
20 196629

About James C. Moore

James C. Moore is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Sociology and Political Science and Education, having authored 122 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (18 papers), ZnO doping and properties (16 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (9 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (9 papers), Ga2O3 and related materials (8 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (8 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (7 papers) and Economic Theory and Policy (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (73 citations), Pharmacy (74 citations), Economics and Econometrics (424 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (186 citations) and General Psychology (19 citations). James C. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Iraq. Frequent co-authors include John S. Chipman, Andrew B. Whinston, Robert Rosenthal, Ralph L. Rosnow, Louis J. Rubbo, A. A. Baski, Andrew B. Whinston, H. Morkoç̌, Daniel J. Delaney and H. Raghav Rao. Their work appears in journals such as Computational Economics, Social Psychology Quarterly, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films and Economic Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact