Dan Simon

43 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Dan Simon's Hit Papers

The Construction of Preference 2006 · 575 citations
5750+6+13Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Dan Simon
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • General Decision Sciences 724
  • Law 295
  • Applied Psychology 136
  • Family Practice 45
  • Safety Research 209
Replace Willem A. Wagenaar with:
Willem A. Wagenaar Netherlands
Peter Ayton United Kingdom
Maya Bar‐Hillel Israel
Peter Juslin Sweden
Karl Halvor Teigen Norway
Michael E. Doherty United States
Stefan M. Herzog Germany
Gideon Keren Netherlands
Stephen E. Newstead United Kingdom
Nigel Harvey United Kingdom
Dan Simon relative to Willem A. Wagenaar Netherlands Willem A. Wagenaar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Willem A. Wagenaar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Simon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Simon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Simon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Simon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Simon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Simon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Simon. The network helps show where Dan Simon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Dan Simon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Simon Line = papers co-authored together Dan Simon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Construction of Preference
Hit paper breakdown →
2006575
2 1999295
3 2004208
4 2004172
5 2002114
6 2001107
7 1994105
8
A Third View of the Black Box: Cognitive Coherence in Legal Decision Making
200497
9 200171
10 199150
11 201244
12 200439
13 201235
14 201133
15 199330
16 199927
17 202022
18 201616
19 200316
20
4. Parallel constraint satisfaction as a mechanism for cognitive consistency
201215

About Dan Simon

Dan Simon is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Law, Economics and Econometrics, Social Psychology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 45 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (15 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (9 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (6 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics (4 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (4 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (724 citations), Law (295 citations), Applied Psychology (136 citations), Family Practice (45 citations) and Safety Research (209 citations). Dan Simon has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Keith J. Holyoak, Stephen J. Read, Daniel C. Krawczyk, Lien B. Pham, Quang A. Le, Paul Slovic, Amos Tversky, Christopher K. Hsee, David M. Grether and David Schkade. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Science, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact