Countries where authors publish in Social Psychology Quarterly
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Psychology Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Psychology Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Psychology Quarterly more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Social Psychology Quarterly
This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Psychology Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Psychology Quarterly.
About Social Psychology Quarterly
The 1.3k papers published in Social Psychology Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 93.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Social Psychology Quarterly usually cover General Psychology (36 papers), Sociology and Political Science (843 papers), Social Psychology (248 papers), Gender Studies (98 papers) and Safety Research (93 papers) specifically the topics of Social and Intergroup Psychology (379 papers), Social Power and Status Dynamics (347 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (81 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (73 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (63 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (56 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (52 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Psychology Quarterly are Peter J. Burke, Jan E. Stets, Glen H. Elder, Richard P. Bagozzi, Corey L. M. Keyes, Sheldon Stryker, Peggy A. Thoits, Philip E. Tetlock, Peter L. Callero and Richard B. Felson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.