James Broesch

10 papers receiving 714 citations

Peers

James Broesch
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Cultural Studies 191
  • Social Psychology 216
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 90
  • Communication 47
  • Sociology and Political Science 290
Replace Daniel Major‐Smith with:
Daniel Major‐Smith United Kingdom
Carmella C. Moore United States
Michelle Scalise Sugiyama United States
Anne C. Pisor United States
Norbert Roß United States
Jasmine M. DeJesus United States
Fiona M. Jordan United Kingdom
Suzanne Gaskins United States
Richard J. Preston Canada
Anthony Seeger United States
James Broesch relative to Daniel Major‐Smith United Kingdom Daniel Major‐Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Daniel Major‐Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Broesch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Broesch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Broesch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Broesch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Broesch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Broesch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Broesch. The network helps show where James Broesch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside James Broesch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Broesch Line = papers co-authored together James Broesch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2011216
2 2009163
3 201278
4 200963
5 200861
6 201250
7 200733
8 201630
9 201228
10 201425

About James Broesch

James Broesch is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 747 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers), Language and cultural evolution (4 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (1 paper), Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (1 paper) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (191 citations), Social Psychology (216 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (90 citations), Communication (47 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (290 citations). James Broesch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Henrich, H. Clark Barrett, Victòria Reyes-García, Susan Tanner, Thomas W. McDade, William R. Leonard, Tomás Huanca, Laura Calvet‐Mir, Nuria Fuentes‐Peláez and Craig Hadley. Their work appears in journals such as Evolution and Human Behavior, American Journal of Human Biology, Child Development, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Communication Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact