Jack Lyons

37 papers receiving 757 citations

Peers

Jack Lyons
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Philosophy 492
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 355
  • History and Philosophy of Science 109
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 366
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 45
Replace Conor McHugh with:
Conor McHugh United Kingdom
Rand B. Evans United States
Marie‐Christine Nizzi United States
Tom Cochrane United Kingdom
C. Mackenzie Brown United States
Michael Krausz Canada
Bernard Fauré France
Neon Brooks United States
David Adé France
Sandra Schwab Switzerland
Jack Lyons relative to Conor McHugh United Kingdom Conor McHugh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×45×
Conor McHugh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Lyons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Lyons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Lyons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Lyons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Lyons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Lyons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Lyons. The network helps show where Jack Lyons may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Jack Lyons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Lyons Line = papers co-authored together Jack Lyons links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004199
2 2009134
3 2009102
4 201187
5 199770
6 201242
7 200541
8 201927
9 200120
10 201517
11 200516
12
Epistemological Problems of Perception
201616
13 201614
14 202112
15 201512
16 200812
17 201610
18 200610
19 20169
20 20217

About Jack Lyons

Jack Lyons is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science and Social Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 908 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (22 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (19 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Free Will and Agency (5 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (492 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (355 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (109 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (366 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (45 citations). Jack Lyons has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Oliver Cvitanic, Peter J. Graham, Siyang Wang, Jeffrey Rosenbloom, Emer Lawlor, Stacey L. Silvers, Oriol Gavalda‐Diaz, Jacquelynne P. Corey, Barry Ward and Bobby A. Tajudeen. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Philosophical Issues, Philosophical Topics, Synthese and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact