Neon Brooks

1.4k citations
33 papers · 646 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Neon Brooks

30 papers receiving 625 citations

Peers

Neon Brooks
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 311
  • Statistics and Probability 87
  • Language and Linguistics 110
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 107
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 131
Replace Wim H. J. van Bon with:
Wim H. J. van Bon Netherlands
Elise de Bree Netherlands
Renata Meuter Australia
Makiko Naka Japan
Allegra Cattani United Kingdom
Sandra Laing Gillam United States
Wyatte C. Hall United States
Bernard Grela United States
Lowry Hemphill United States
Raúl Sánchez García Spain
Neon Brooks relative to Wim H. J. van Bon Netherlands Wim H. J. van Bon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.3×
Wim H. J. van Bon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neon Brooks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neon Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neon Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neon Brooks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neon Brooks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neon Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neon Brooks. The network helps show where Neon Brooks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neon Brooks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neon Brooks Line = papers co-authored together Neon Brooks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010188
2 201760
3 201950
4 201544
5 201644
6 202030
7 201729
8 201925
9 201021
10 202118
11 201217
12 201916
13 202116
14 201815
15 201215
16 201910
17 20037
18 20106
19 20206
20 20245

About Neon Brooks

Neon Brooks is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Surgery, General Health Professions and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 33 papers that have together received 646 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (8 papers), Language Development and Disorders (5 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers), Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (2 papers) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (311 citations), Statistics and Probability (87 citations), Language and Linguistics (110 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (107 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (131 citations). Neon Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include David Barner, Alan Bale, Susan Goldin‐Meadow, Elizabeth S. Spelke, Shari Liu, Michael C. Frank, David M. Mosen, Matthew P. Banegas, Eliza Congdon and Miriam A. Novack. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Science, Population Health Management, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Journal of Adolescent Health and The Journal of the American Dental Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact