C. Mackenzie Brown

713 citations
34 papers · 322 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

C. Mackenzie Brown

29 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers

C. Mackenzie Brown
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • History and Philosophy of Science 41
  • Philosophy 84
  • Religious studies 23
  • Geography, Planning and Development 25
  • General Psychology 5
Replace Wassily Kandinsky with:
Wassily Kandinsky
Allan Shields United States
Rebecca Jones United States
Maria Kallery Greece
Peter Conradi Germany
Theo Herrmann Germany
Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis Denmark
Richard Patterson United States
Nigel J. T. Thomas United States
Tamer G. Amin Lebanon
C. Mackenzie Brown relative to Wassily Kandinsky Wassily Kandinsky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.5×
Wassily Kandinsky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Mackenzie Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Mackenzie Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Mackenzie Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Mackenzie Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Mackenzie Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Mackenzie Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Mackenzie Brown. The network helps show where C. Mackenzie Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside C. Mackenzie Brown, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Mackenzie Brown Line = papers co-authored together C. Mackenzie Brown links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199152
2 199142
3 200730
4 200426
5 201226
6 200420
7 201013
8 200311
9 20079
10 20089
11 19917
12 19867
13 20127
14
Boundary control and legal principles
19576
15 19866
16 20126
17
Narrow Mental Content
20115
18 19925
19 19885
20 20095

About C. Mackenzie Brown

C. Mackenzie Brown is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Religious studies, having authored 34 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Science Education (6 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (4 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (3 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers) and History of Medicine Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (41 citations), Philosophy (84 citations), Religious studies (23 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (25 citations) and General Psychology (5 citations). C. Mackenzie Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Charleen M. Moore, Steven Luper‐Foy, David Coombs, David Kinsley, Steven Luper, Donald A. Wilson and Peter A. French. Their work appears in journals such as Zygon®, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Philosophical Studies, Synthese and International Journal of Hindu Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact