Jack L. Capps
Impact in
-
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
- American and British Literature Analysis
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Digital Humanities and Scholarship
- Philosophy top 5%
- Rhetoric and Communication Studies
Papers in
-
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 4
- American and British Literature Analysis 3
- Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 2
- Themes in Literature Analysis 1
-
- Publishing and Scholarly Communication 3
- Co-authors
- Cristanne Miller (1 shared paper)David C. Porter (1 shared paper)Cleanth Brooks (1 shared paper)Elizabeth N. Kerr (1 shared paper)Charles R. Anderson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Literature (7 papers)Resources for American Literary Study (2 papers)The New England Quarterly (1 paper)Harvard University Press eBooks (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Jack L. Capps
7 papers receiving 47 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Literature and Literary Theory 139
- Philosophy 47
- History and Philosophy of Science 16
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 16
- History 23
Countries citing papers authored by Jack L. Capps
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack L. Capps's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack L. Capps with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack L. Capps more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack L. Capps
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack L. Capps. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack L. Capps. The network helps show where Jack L. Capps may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Jack L. Capps, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1966 | 60 | |
| 3 | 1982 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1984 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1966 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1982 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1966 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1980 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 11 | The William Faulkner collection at West Point and the Faulkner concordances | 1974 | 0 |
| 12 | 1967 | 0 |
About Jack L. Capps
Jack L. Capps is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Philosophy of Science, Language and Linguistics, Sociology and Political Science and Museology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 218 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Poetry Analysis and Criticism (4 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (3 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (3 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (2 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (2 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (1 paper), Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper) and Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (139 citations), Philosophy (47 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (16 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (16 citations) and History (23 citations). Frequent co-authors include Cristanne Miller, David C. Porter, Cleanth Brooks, Elizabeth N. Kerr and Charles R. Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as American Literature, Resources for American Literary Study, The New England Quarterly, Harvard University Press eBooks and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.