William Keach
Impact in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
Papers in
-
- Philippine History and Culture 2
- Historical and Literary Studies 2
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 3
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 1
- Co-authors
- Hans Aarsleff (1 shared paper)Kevin Gilmartin (1 shared paper)David M. Simpson (1 shared paper)John A. Hodgson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Studies in Romanticism (7 papers)European Romantic Review (2 papers)Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes (1 paper)Modern Philology (1 paper)The Wordsworth Circle (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
William Keach
16 papers receiving 186 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Literature and Literary Theory 109
- History and Philosophy of Science 35
- History 75
- Philosophy 69
- Language and Linguistics 59
Countries citing papers authored by William Keach
This map shows the geographic impact of William Keach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Keach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Keach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Keach
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Keach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Keach. The network helps show where William Keach may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside William Keach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1985 | 162 | |
| 2 | 1977 | 47 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 31 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1978 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1981 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1977 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 1 |
About William Keach
William Keach is a scholar working on Anthropology, Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Molecular Biology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (5 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (2 papers), Science Education and Perceptions (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (1 paper), Archaeological Research and Protection (1 paper) and Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (109 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (35 citations), History (75 citations), Philosophy (69 citations) and Language and Linguistics (59 citations). William Keach has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Hans Aarsleff, Kevin Gilmartin, David M. Simpson and John A. Hodgson. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Romanticism, European Romantic Review, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, Modern Philology and The Wordsworth Circle.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.