Stuart Peterfreund

409 citations
32 papers · 209 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Stuart Peterfreund

18 papers receiving 101 citations

Peers

Stuart Peterfreund
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Literature and Literary Theory 116
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 22
  • History 41
  • Philosophy 42
  • Cultural Studies 26
Replace Thomas Weiskel with:
Thomas Weiskel
George Monteiro United States
Gerhart Hoffmeister United States
Christine Froula United States
Margery Sabin United States
Lynn A. Higgins United States
Richard Todd United Kingdom
Gabriel Josipovici United Kingdom
Martin Swales United Kingdom
Cheryl Lester United States
Stuart Peterfreund relative to Thomas Weiskel Thomas Weiskel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Thomas Weiskel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Peterfreund

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Peterfreund's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Peterfreund with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Peterfreund more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Peterfreund

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Peterfreund. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Peterfreund. The network helps show where Stuart Peterfreund may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Stuart Peterfreund, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart Peterfreund Line = papers co-authored together Stuart Peterfreund links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980132
2
William Blake in a Newtonian world : essays on literature as art and science
199816
3 20047
4 19886
5 20065
6 20125
7 19924
8 19943
9 19943
10 19793
11 20053
12 19853
13 19913
14
Imagination at a Distance: Bacon's Epistemological Double-Bind, Natural Theology, and the Way of Scienticic Explanation in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries
20002
15 19852
16 19811
17 19811
18
Culture/criticism/ideology
19871
19
Wordsworth on Covenants, "Heart Conditions," Primogeniture, Remains, and the Ties That Bind in "Michael" and Elsewhere
19981
20 19971

About Stuart Peterfreund

Stuart Peterfreund is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science and Language and Linguistics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 209 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Moravian Church and William Blake (5 papers), History of Science and Medicine (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (2 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (2 papers) and Evolution and Science Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (116 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (22 citations), History (41 citations), Philosophy (42 citations) and Cultural Studies (26 citations). Stuart Peterfreund has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Weiskel, G. S. Rousseau, Robert Markley, Thomas Laqueur, Richard Olson, Michael Hunter, Vivian Nutton and Barbara Maria Stafford. Their work appears in journals such as The Wordsworth Circle, ELH, Studies in Romanticism, European Romantic Review and Eighteenth-Century Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact