Stuart Peterfreund

407 citations
30 papers · 156 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Stuart Peterfreund

16 papers receiving 66 citations

Peers

Stuart Peterfreund
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Literature and Literary Theory 75
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 21
  • Philosophy 37
  • History 26
  • History and Philosophy of Science 11
Replace Thomas Weiskel with:
Thomas Weiskel
Lynn A. Higgins United States
Betty T. Bennett United States
Thomas McFarland United States
Paul H. Fry United States
Margery Sabin United States
Robert G. O’Meally United States
Pierre Saint-Amand
Rachel M. Brownstein United States
John T. Irwin United Kingdom
Stuart Peterfreund relative to Thomas Weiskel Thomas Weiskel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Thomas Weiskel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Peterfreund

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Peterfreund's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Peterfreund with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Peterfreund more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Peterfreund

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Peterfreund. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Peterfreund. The network helps show where Stuart Peterfreund may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Stuart Peterfreund, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart Peterfreund Line = papers co-authored together Stuart Peterfreund links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980104
2
William Blake in a Newtonian world : essays on literature as art and science
19987
3 20065
4 19885
5 20125
6 19793
7 19943
8 19943
9 20053
10 19853
11
Imagination at a Distance: Bacon's Epistemological Double-Bind, Natural Theology, and the Way of Scienticic Explanation in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries
20002
12 19922
13 19912
14 20041
15 19811
16
Wordsworth on Covenants, "Heart Conditions," Primogeniture, Remains, and the Ties That Bind in "Michael" and Elsewhere
19981
17 19851
18 19961
19 19821
20
Culture/criticism/ideology
19871

About Stuart Peterfreund

Stuart Peterfreund is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology, Language and Linguistics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 156 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Moravian Church and William Blake (5 papers), History of Science and Medicine (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (2 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers), Evolution and Science Education (2 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (2 papers) and Science Education and Perceptions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (75 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (21 citations), Philosophy (37 citations), History (26 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (11 citations). Stuart Peterfreund has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Weiskel, G. S. Rousseau, Robert Markley, Barbara Maria Stafford, Thomas Laqueur, Richard Olson, Michael Hunter and Vivian Nutton. Their work appears in journals such as The Wordsworth Circle, ELH, Studies in Romanticism, Eighteenth-Century Studies and European Romantic Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact