Resources for American Literary Study

1.5k citations
467 papers · · active since 1971

Impact in

    • American and British Literature Analysis
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
    • Modernist Literature and Criticism
    • Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis
  • History top 10%
    • American Literature and Culture

Papers in

    • American and British Literature Analysis 209
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism 91
    • Autobiographical and Biographical Writing 87
    • American Literature and Humor Studies 71
    • Modernist Literature and Criticism 26
    • Modern American Literature Studies 21
    • American Literature and Culture 234
    • Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books 45

Resources for American Literary Study

229 papers receiving 571 citations

Peers

Resources for American Literary Study
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Literature and Literary Theory 821
  • History 343
  • Music 63
  • Anthropology 115
  • Philosophy 102
Replace Journal of Victorian Culture with:
Journal of Victorian Culture United Kingdom
Nineteenth Century Contexts United States
Arizona quarterly/˜The œArizona quarterly United States
Early American literature United States
European Romantic Review United States
English Journal of the English Association United Kingdom
Studies in American fiction United States
English studies in Canada Canada
Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies United Kingdom
Nineteenth-Century Literature United States
Resources for American Literary Study relative to Journal of Victorian Culture United Kingdom Journal of Victorian Culture's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Journal of Victorian Culture · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Resources for American Literary Study

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Resources for American Literary Study. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Resources for American Literary Study with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Resources for American Literary Study more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Resources for American Literary Study

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Resources for American Literary Study. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Resources for American Literary Study.

About Resources for American Literary Study

The 467 papers published in Resources for American Literary Study in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Resources for American Literary Study usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (400 papers), History (272 papers), Music (13 papers), Anthropology (20 papers) and Museology (5 papers) specifically the topics of American Literature and Culture (234 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (209 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (91 papers), Autobiographical and Biographical Writing (87 papers), American Literature and Humor Studies (71 papers), Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (45 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (26 papers) and Modern American Literature Studies (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Resources for American Literary Study are Carolyn L. Karcher, Robert S. Levine, Joel Myerson, Jed Rasula, Bernard W. Bell, Keneth Kinnamon, Michael Davitt Bell, Robert Hughes, James W. Tuttleton and Robert Milder.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact