Resources for American Literary Study

1.7k citations
685 papers · · active since 1951

Impact in

    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
    • American and British Literature Analysis
    • French Literature and Poetry
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis
    • Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis
  • Music top 10%
    • Musicology and Musical Analysis

Papers in

    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism 69
    • American and British Literature Analysis 68
    • American Literature and Humor Studies 20
    • Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 18
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis 16
    • American Literature and Culture 34

Resources for American Literary Study

106 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

Resources for American Literary Study
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Literature and Literary Theory 881
  • Music 157
  • History 289
  • Cultural Studies 162
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 80
Replace Nineteenth-Century Literature with:
Nineteenth-Century Literature United States
Arizona quarterly/˜The œArizona quarterly United States
Journal of Victorian Culture United Kingdom
Victorian Literature and Culture United States
The Hudson Review
College literature United States
Nineteenth Century Contexts United States
Canadian Review of American Studies Canada
Victorian Studies United States
Postmodern Culture United States
Resources for American Literary Study relative to Nineteenth-Century Literature United States Nineteenth-Century Literature's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Nineteenth-Century Literature · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Resources for American Literary Study

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Resources for American Literary Study. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Resources for American Literary Study with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Resources for American Literary Study more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Resources for American Literary Study

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Resources for American Literary Study. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Resources for American Literary Study.

About Resources for American Literary Study

The 685 papers published in Resources for American Literary Study in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Resources for American Literary Study usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (168 papers), History (59 papers), Music (12 papers), Cultural Studies (25 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (12 papers) specifically the topics of Poetry Analysis and Criticism (69 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (68 papers), American Literature and Culture (34 papers), American Literature and Humor Studies (20 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (20 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (18 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (16 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Resources for American Literary Study are Keith Clark, Carolyn L. Karcher, Robert S. Levine, Mary Ellis Gibson, James R. Giles, Joel Myerson, Bernard W. Bell, Keneth Kinnamon, Gary Burns and Michael Davitt Bell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact