Jack E. Smith

809 citations
15 papers · 535 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jack E. Smith

14 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers

Jack E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Internal Medicine 81
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 309
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 25
  • Hematology 77
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 125
Replace Paola Gottschalk with:
Paola Gottschalk United States
A Diamantopoulos United States
Suzan Lowe United States
B. A. Th. F. Gabreëls Netherlands
Alicia Zha United States
C. Mussap Australia
Roque Villagra Chile
Mark R. Vesely United States
Morten Krogh Christiansen Denmark
Juan A. Rodriguez United States
Jack E. Smith relative to Paola Gottschalk United States Paola Gottschalk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Paola Gottschalk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack E. Smith. The network helps show where Jack E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jack E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Jack E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1995229
2 1995142
3 199451
4 199443
5 199121
6 198211
7 19909
8 19818
9 19956
10 19915
11 19914
12 19912
13
Temporal spectrum of ischemic complications with percutaneous coronary intervention: the ESPRIT experience.
20042
14 19901
15 19901

About Jack E. Smith

Jack E. Smith is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 535 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (7 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (5 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (2 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers) and Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (81 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (309 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (25 citations), Hematology (77 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (125 citations). Jack E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Frank I. Navetta, James E. Tcheng, Michael M. Kitt, Kandice Kottke‐Marchant, Kristina N. Sigmon, Stephen G. Ellis, Robert M. Califf, Seth J. Worley, Neal S. Kleiman and Robert A. Harrington. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, The American Journal of Cardiology, Cancer Letters, American Heart Journal and Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact