J. Van Hoof

22 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers

J. Van Hoof
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Endocrinology 69
  • Food Science 211
  • Biotechnology 97
  • Animal Science and Zoology 105
  • Infectious Diseases 102
Replace R. Irwin with:
R. Irwin Canada
G. Hildebrandt Germany
Philipp Hammer Germany
Leonardo de Knegt Denmark
H. Stegeman Netherlands
Bayleyegn Molla United States
Carole Feurer France
Michel Vallé United States
Meenaxi Sharma United Kingdom
Cornelius Poppe Canada
J. Van Hoof relative to R. Irwin Canada R. Irwin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
R. Irwin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Van Hoof

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Van Hoof's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Van Hoof with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Van Hoof more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Van Hoof

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Van Hoof. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Van Hoof. The network helps show where J. Van Hoof may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Van Hoof, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Van Hoof Line = papers co-authored together J. Van Hoof links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200469
2 197945
3 199544
4 200236
5 199935
6 200435
7 198431
8 199027
9 200226
10 199226
11 198917
12 200111
13 198410
14 19859
15 19929
16
Quality of the meat after the application of anabolic agents in young calves.
19768
17
Occurrence of Salmonella in a chemical wastewater treatment plant.
19846
18
Bacteriological contamination in wastewaters from slaughterhouses.
19805
19 20042
20
HPTLC of thyreostatic drugs with GC-MS confirmation
19921

About J. Van Hoof

J. Van Hoof is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, Clinical Biochemistry and Biotechnology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 454 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial infections and disease research (5 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (4 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (4 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (3 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (2 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (2 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (2 papers) and Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (69 citations), Food Science (211 citations), Biotechnology (97 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (105 citations) and Infectious Diseases (102 citations). J. Van Hoof has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Lieven De Zutter, Luc Devriese, C. Godard, L. Okerman, Ann Tutenel, Denis Piérard, Dominiek Maes, Hein Imberechts, Aart de Kruif and Kurt Houf. Their work appears in journals such as Food Additives & Contaminants, Journal of Applied Microbiology, International Journal of Food Microbiology, Epidemiology and Infection and Clinical Infectious Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact