J. Bohner

37 papers receiving 569 citations

Peers

J. Bohner
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Biological Psychiatry 34
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 50
  • Internal Medicine 31
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 169
  • Hematology 88
Replace K Barbosa with:
K Barbosa United States
Agnieszka Kapłon‐Cieślicka Poland
Wojciech Turaj Poland
Jun Muratsu Japan
Petra Hobisch‐Hagen Austria
Yasuyuki Tsujita Japan
H. E. Sjöberg Sweden
A Gressner Germany
Maciej Gonciarz Poland
Anca Moțățăianu Romania
J. Bohner relative to K Barbosa United States K Barbosa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
K Barbosa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Bohner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Bohner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Bohner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Bohner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Bohner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Bohner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Bohner. The network helps show where J. Bohner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Bohner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Bohner Line = papers co-authored together J. Bohner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200592
2 200762
3
Evaluation of a new alpha-amylase assay using 4.6-ethylidene-(G7)-1-4-nitrophenyl-(G1)-alpha-D-maltoheptaoside as substrate.
198949
4 198243
5 200043
6 198537
7 200736
8 199832
9 198227
10 198524
11 197924
12 198721
13 198121
14 198512
15 198111
16 197910
17 19858
18 19948
19 19797
20 19806

About J. Bohner

J. Bohner is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 41 papers that have together received 614 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (4 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (4 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (4 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis (2 papers), Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (2 papers) and Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (34 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (50 citations), Internal Medicine (31 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (169 citations) and Hematology (88 citations). J. Bohner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Stein, M. Eggstein, Katrin Pape, Andreas Calatzis, M. Spannagl, Aleksander A. Mathé, Chin B. Eap, Hans Ågren, Georg Nikisch and Adelheid Czernik. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Chemistry, Journal of Molecular Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), Thrombosis and Haemostasis and Clinica Chimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact