Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

171.7k citations
8.8k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

7.3k papers receiving 146.8k citations

Peers

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
  • Nephrology 7.9k
  • Clinical Biochemistry 7.1k
  • Physiology 25.5k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 14.6k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 6.2k
Replace Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation with:
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation Denmark
Clinical Biochemistry Canada
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics United States
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology United Kingdom
Mayo Clinic Proceedings United States
European Journal of Clinical Investigation Germany
Journal of Surgical Research United States
Postgraduate Medical Journal United Kingdom
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine United Kingdom
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Germany
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) relative to Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation Denmark Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM).

About Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

The 8.8k papers published in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) in the last decades have received a total of 171.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) usually cover Clinical Biochemistry (529 papers), Nephrology (435 papers), Physiology (1.4k papers), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (839 papers) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (344 papers) specifically the topics of Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (935 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (333 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (298 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (239 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (195 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (192 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (188 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (187 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) are Mario Plebani, Giuseppe Lippi, Mauro Panteghini, H. Passing, W. Bablok, Callum G. Fraser, Wolfgang Herrmann, Gian Cesare Guidi, Giuseppe Banfi and Ana-Maria Šimundić.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact