Iolanda Ribeiro

689 citations
54 papers · 478 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Iolanda Ribeiro

51 papers receiving 443 citations

Peers

Iolanda Ribeiro
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 271
  • Education 194
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
  • Statistics and Probability 40
  • Clinical Psychology 58
Replace Nicole Pyle with:
Nicole Pyle United States
Marilyn W. Goodwin United States
Douglas D. Dexter United States
Kejin Lee United States
Kathleen B. Aspiranti United States
Krisztián Józsa Hungary
Scott A. Methe United States
Amber Bivins Ray United States
Matthias Grünke Germany
Kelli D. Cummings United States
Iolanda Ribeiro relative to Nicole Pyle United States Nicole Pyle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Nicole Pyle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Iolanda Ribeiro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Iolanda Ribeiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iolanda Ribeiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iolanda Ribeiro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Iolanda Ribeiro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iolanda Ribeiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iolanda Ribeiro. The network helps show where Iolanda Ribeiro may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Iolanda Ribeiro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Iolanda Ribeiro Line = papers co-authored together Iolanda Ribeiro links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201681
2 201641
3 201527
4 201623
5 201621
6 201819
7 201617
8 201717
9 201715
10 202114
11 201612
12 201911
13 201711
14 201510
15 20149
16 20139
17 20209
18 20149
19 20158
20 20228

About Iolanda Ribeiro

Iolanda Ribeiro is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Literature and Literary Theory, Cognitive Neuroscience and Statistics and Probability, having authored 54 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (31 papers), Language Development and Disorders (10 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (7 papers), Linguistics and Education Research (7 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (6 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (6 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (5 papers) and Education and Digital Technologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (271 citations), Education (194 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 citations), Statistics and Probability (40 citations) and Clinical Psychology (58 citations). Iolanda Ribeiro has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Irene Cadime, Fernanda Leopoldina Viana, Sandra Santos, Sara Lima, Alexandra Marques Pinto, Gerardo Prieto, Ana Lúcia Santos, José António Ribeiro Maia, Vanda Andrade and Leandro S. Almeida. Their work appears in journals such as Reading and Writing, Frontiers in Psychology, First Language, European Journal of Developmental Psychology and Journal of Child Language.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact