Inga Smit
Impact in
- Insect Science top 2%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
-
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in
-
- Plant Pathogens and Resistance 4
- Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food 3
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 2
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics 2
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance 2
-
- Potato Plant Research 6
- Co-authors
- Elke Pawelzik (16 shared papers)Catrin Westphal (3 shared papers)Teja Tscharntke (3 shared papers)Björn K. Klatt (1 shared paper)Andrea Holzschuh (1 shared paper)Yann Clough (1 shared paper)Marcel Naumann (6 shared papers)Mirjam Koch (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Inga Smit
26 papers receiving 777 citations
Inga Smit's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Insect Science 339
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 428
- Plant Science 435
- Horticulture 11
- Food Science 108
Countries citing papers authored by Inga Smit
This map shows the geographic impact of Inga Smit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inga Smit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inga Smit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inga Smit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inga Smit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inga Smit. The network helps show where Inga Smit may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inga Smit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bee pollination improves crop quality, shelf life and commercial value Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 423 |
| 2 | 2018 | 97 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 90 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 3 |
About Inga Smit
Inga Smit is a scholar working on Plant Science, Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Insect Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 809 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Potato Plant Research (6 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (4 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Food composition and properties (3 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (2 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (2 papers) and Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (339 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (428 citations), Plant Science (435 citations), Horticulture (11 citations) and Food Science (108 citations). Inga Smit has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Belgium and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Elke Pawelzik, Catrin Westphal, Teja Tscharntke, Björn K. Klatt, Andrea Holzschuh, Yann Clough, Marcel Naumann, Mirjam Koch, Petr Karlovský and Bálint Jákli. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Physiologia Plantarum and Plant Physiology and Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.