Plant Physiology and Biochemistry

273.8k citations
9.0k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Plant Science top 0.5%
    • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
    • Plant Molecular Biology Research
    • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
    • Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
    • Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
    • Plant responses to water stress

Papers in

    • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance 3.0k
    • Plant Molecular Biology Research 1.4k
    • Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 1.1k
    • Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects 789
    • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity 628

Plant Physiology and Biochemistry

8.4k papers receiving 266.2k citations

Peers

Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
Comparison fields: 5 of 207
  • Plant Science 202.5k
  • Biochemistry 10.9k
  • Molecular Biology 91.2k
  • Pollution 14.9k
  • Biochemistry 7.0k
Replace Journal of Plant Physiology with:
Journal of Plant Physiology Germany
Plant Science China
Trends in Plant Science United States
Plants China
Plant and Cell Physiology Japan
Plant Cell & Environment United States
Physiologia Plantarum United States
BMC Plant Biology China
Current Opinion in Plant Biology United States
Planta Germany
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry relative to Journal of Plant Physiology Germany Journal of Plant Physiology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Journal of Plant Physiology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Plant Physiology and Biochemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Plant Physiology and Biochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plant Physiology and Biochemistry more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Plant Physiology and Biochemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Plant Physiology and Biochemistry.

About Plant Physiology and Biochemistry

The 9.0k papers published in Plant Physiology and Biochemistry in the last decades have received a total of 273.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Plant Physiology and Biochemistry usually cover Plant Science (7.1k papers), Biochemistry (361 papers), Molecular Biology (4.1k papers), Biochemistry (298 papers) and Horticulture (38 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (3.0k papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (1.4k papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (1.3k papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (1.1k papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (994 papers), Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (789 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (633 papers) and Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (628 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Plant Physiology and Biochemistry are Sarvajeet Singh Gill, Narendra Tuteja, Andrzej Bajguz, Shamsul Hayat, Bernard R. Glick, Vijay Pratap Singh, Daniel J. Cosgrove, Sheo Mohan Prasad, Małgorzata Olszowy‐Tomczyk and Chédly Abdelly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact