Hunter Jackson

1.4k citations
28 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Hunter Jackson

26 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Hunter Jackson
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Sensory Systems 436
  • Developmental Biology 140
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 586
  • Developmental Neuroscience 58
  • Insect Science 140
Replace Eleonora Katz with:
Eleonora Katz Argentina
Katie S. Kindt United States
John H. Teeter United States
Heather M. Schellinck Canada
Joseph G. Dulka Canada
Kimihisa Takeda Japan
Dominic Man‐Kit Lam United States
Tobias F. Marton United States
Lloyd M. Beidler United States
Roberto Tirindelli Italy
Hunter Jackson relative to Eleonora Katz Argentina Eleonora Katz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Eleonora Katz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hunter Jackson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hunter Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hunter Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hunter Jackson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hunter Jackson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hunter Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hunter Jackson. The network helps show where Hunter Jackson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hunter Jackson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hunter Jackson Line = papers co-authored together Hunter Jackson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988155
2 1982149
3 1994133
4 1982105
5 198298
6 198994
7 198788
8 197876
9 198553
10 198447
11 198345
12 199141
13 202227
14 198827
15 198726
16 198522
17 199121
18 196921
19 198919
20 199018

About Hunter Jackson

Hunter Jackson is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Molecular Biology, Ecology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (9 papers), Marine animal studies overview (7 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (7 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (4 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (436 citations), Developmental Biology (140 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (586 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (58 citations) and Insect Science (140 citations). Hunter Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Thomas N. Parks, Edwin W. Rubel, P.N.R. Usherwood, John T. Hackett, Edward F. Nemeth, Nicholas A. Saccomano, Alan L. Mueller, Robert A. Volkmann, Alan H. Ganong and Benedict C. Albensi. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Neuroscience, Trends in Neurosciences, Journal of Neuroscience and Annual Review of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact