Annual Review of Neuroscience

378.6k citations
1.3k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
    • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
    • Neural dynamics and brain function
    • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
    • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Papers in

    • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 256
    • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 99
    • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 89
    • Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling 66
    • Neural dynamics and brain function 257
    • Memory and Neural Mechanisms 100
    • Visual perception and processing mechanisms 92

Annual Review of Neuroscience

1.1k papers receiving 357.6k citations

Peers

Annual Review of Neuroscience
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 145.8k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 143.9k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 25.6k
  • Sensory Systems 17.6k
  • Neurology 29.8k
Replace Physiological Reviews with:
Physiological Reviews United States
Brain Research Reviews United States
Learning & Memory United States
Pharmacological Reviews United States
The Neuroscientist United States
Annual Review of Psychology United States
The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology United States
Neural Plasticity China
International review of neurobiology United States
Genes Brain & Behavior United States
Annual Review of Neuroscience relative to Physiological Reviews United States Physiological Reviews's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Physiological Reviews · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Annual Review of Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annual Review of Neuroscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annual Review of Neuroscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Review of Neuroscience more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Annual Review of Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annual Review of Neuroscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annual Review of Neuroscience.

About Annual Review of Neuroscience

The 1.3k papers published in Annual Review of Neuroscience in the last decades have received a total of 378.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Annual Review of Neuroscience usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (570 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (438 papers), Developmental Neuroscience (88 papers), Sensory Systems (68 papers) and Neurology (92 papers) specifically the topics of Neural dynamics and brain function (257 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (256 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (100 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (99 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (92 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (89 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (86 papers) and Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (66 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annual Review of Neuroscience are Joseph E. LeDoux, Jonathan D. Cohen, Earl K. Miller, Michael I. Posner, Robert Desimone, Marcus E. Raichle, John S. Duncan, Ronald W. Oppenheim, Laila Craighero and Giacomo Rizzolatti.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact