Hong Chen

4.0k citations
169 papers · 2.9k · h-index 27

Impact in

    • Behavioral Health and Interventions
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
    • Neural dynamics and brain function

Papers in

Hong Chen

157 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Hong Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
  • Applied Psychology 215
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 864
  • Clinical Psychology 767
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 488
  • Internal Medicine 74
Replace Ira H. Bernstein with:
Ira H. Bernstein United States
Hugo Peyre France
Sven C. Mueller Belgium
Stefan Kaiser Switzerland
Harriëtte Riese Netherlands
William David Hill United Kingdom
Zhang Chen China
Birk Diedenhofen Germany
Claire E. Lawrence United Kingdom
Alessandra Gorini Italy
Hong Chen relative to Ira H. Bernstein United States Ira H. Bernstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Ira H. Bernstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hong Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hong Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hong Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hong Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hong Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hong Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hong Chen. The network helps show where Hong Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hong Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hong Chen Line = papers co-authored together Hong Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 169 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019182
2 2018106
3 2012103
4 201796
5 201382
6 202067
7 201865
8 201564
9 201364
10 200761
11 201859
12 202154
13 201154
14 201049
15 202147
16 202046
17 202043
18 201740
19 200740
20 201739

About Hong Chen

Hong Chen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 169 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (43 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (40 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (27 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (22 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (20 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (18 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (11 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (215 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (864 citations), Clinical Psychology (767 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (488 citations) and Internal Medicine (74 citations). Hong Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Macao. Frequent co-authors include Todd Jackson, Guangcan Xiang, Yong Liu, Xu Lei, Jiang Hua Qiu, Luqing Wei, Mingyue Xiao, Debo Dong, Zhiying Zhao and Todd Jackson. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Cerebral Cortex, Neuropsychologia, Nutrients and Eating Behaviors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact