Heather Fox
Impact in
-
- Psychological Testing and Assessment
-
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Papers in
- Genetics 3
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research 3
- Co-authors
- Stephen T. DeMers (2 shared papers)Samuel M. Turner (2 shared papers)Geoffrey M. Reed (2 shared papers)Anthony L. Kovac (1 shared paper)Diane Roulston (1 shared paper)Kerby Shedden (2 shared papers)Lawrence J. Marentette (2 shared papers)Steven L. Sauter (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Blood (2 papers)American Psychologist (2 papers)Infection and Immunity (1 paper)Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology (1 paper)Industrial Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaBangladesh
In The Last Decade
Heather Fox
11 papers receiving 313 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Applied Psychology 28
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 75
- Genetics 45
- General Psychology 6
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 21
Countries citing papers authored by Heather Fox
This map shows the geographic impact of Heather Fox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather Fox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather Fox more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Heather Fox
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather Fox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather Fox. The network helps show where Heather Fox may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Heather Fox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 135 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 70 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 0 |
About Heather Fox
Heather Fox is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (3 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (1 paper), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (1 paper), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (1 paper), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (1 paper), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (1 paper) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (28 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (75 citations), Genetics (45 citations), General Psychology (6 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (21 citations). Heather Fox has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Stephen T. DeMers, Samuel M. Turner, Geoffrey M. Reed, Anthony L. Kovac, Diane Roulston, Kerby Shedden, Lawrence J. Marentette, Steven L. Sauter, Mehmet Ali Yıldız and Sami N. Malek. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, American Psychologist, Infection and Immunity, Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology and Industrial Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.