Harold Bennett

53 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers

Harold Bennett
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Geometry and Topology 391
  • Algebra and Number Theory 172
  • Mathematical Physics 225
  • Management Science and Operations Research 157
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 153
Replace William F. Lindgren with:
William F. Lindgren United States
Miroslav Hus̆ek Czechia
Phillip Zenor United States
J. M. Worrell United States
Jerry E. Vaughan United States
Keiô Nagami Japan
R. A. McCoy United States
Fletcher
William Weiss Canada
William G. Fleissner United States
Harold Bennett relative to William F. Lindgren United States William F. Lindgren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.5×
William F. Lindgren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Harold Bennett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Harold Bennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harold Bennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harold Bennett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Harold Bennett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harold Bennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harold Bennett. The network helps show where Harold Bennett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Harold Bennett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Harold Bennett Line = papers co-authored together Harold Bennett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197156
2 197249
3 197125
4 200425
5 200622
6 196920
7 198419
8 200916
9
Topology and order structures
198115
10
Domain-representability of certain complete spaces
200812
11 200712
12 200211
13 196910
14 200210
15 19819
16 19989
17 19999
18 20008
19 19747
20 19967

About Harold Bennett

Harold Bennett is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Management Science and Operations Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 65 papers that have together received 466 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topology and Set Theory (49 papers), Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory (27 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (20 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (19 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (16 papers), Fixed Point Theorems Analysis (6 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (4 papers) and Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (391 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (172 citations), Mathematical Physics (225 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (157 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (153 citations). Harold Bennett has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Japan. Frequent co-authors include David Lutzer, William G. Fleissner, Klaas Pieter Hart, G. M. Reed, Robert W. Heath, Dennis K. Burke, Mary Ellen Rudin and T. G. McLaughlin. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Topology and its Applications, Fundamenta Mathematicae, Pacific Journal of Mathematics and Compositio Mathematica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact