Fundamenta Mathematicae

3.5k papers and 31.5k indexed citations

About

The 3.5k papers published in Fundamenta Mathematicae in the last decades have received a total of 31.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Fundamenta Mathematicae usually cover Geometry and Topology (1.8k papers), Mathematical Physics (1.5k papers) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Topology and Set Theory (1.2k papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (472 papers) and Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (402 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fundamenta Mathematicae are Solomon Feferman, H. Toruńczyk, Andrzej Mostowski, Andrzej Grzegorczyk, Karol Borsuk, Andrzej Ehrenfeucht, Jan Mycielski, Stanley P. Franklin, Miroslav Katětov and Kiiti Morita.

In The Last Decade

Fundamenta Mathematicae

2.5k papers receiving 19.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Fundamenta Mathematicae

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Fundamenta Mathematicae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fundamenta Mathematicae.

Countries where authors publish in Fundamenta Mathematicae

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fundamenta Mathematicae. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fundamenta Mathematicae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fundamenta Mathematicae more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026