Fundamenta Mathematicae

38.1k citations
3.6k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Advanced Topology and Set Theory
    • Geometric and Algebraic Topology
    • Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
    • Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
    • Advanced Banach Space Theory

Papers in

    • Advanced Topology and Set Theory 1.2k
    • Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals 499
    • Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology 432
    • Advanced Banach Space Theory 399

Fundamenta Mathematicae

2.7k papers receiving 23.9k citations

Peers

Fundamenta Mathematicae
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
  • Geometry and Topology 23.4k
  • Mathematical Physics 17.7k
  • Algebra and Number Theory 8.3k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 15.4k
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 2.7k
Replace Topology and its Applications with:
Topology and its Applications United States
Russian Mathematical Surveys Russia
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society Australia
Annales de l’institut Fourier France
Illinois Journal of Mathematics United States
The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics United Kingdom
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin Canada
Proceedings of the Japan Academy Series A Mathematical Sciences Japan
MATHEMATICA SCANDINAVICA United States
Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae Hungary
Fundamenta Mathematicae relative to Topology and its Applications United States Topology and its Applications's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Topology and its Applications · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Fundamenta Mathematicae

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fundamenta Mathematicae. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fundamenta Mathematicae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fundamenta Mathematicae more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Fundamenta Mathematicae

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Fundamenta Mathematicae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fundamenta Mathematicae.

About Fundamenta Mathematicae

The 3.6k papers published in Fundamenta Mathematicae in the last decades have received a total of 38.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Fundamenta Mathematicae usually cover Geometry and Topology (1.9k papers), Mathematical Physics (1.6k papers), Algebra and Number Theory (620 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.1k papers) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (152 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Topology and Set Theory (1.2k papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (499 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (432 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (399 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (382 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (377 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (354 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (279 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fundamenta Mathematicae are Andrzej Włodzimierz Mostowski, Solomon Feferman, Andrzej Grzegorczyk, Andrzej Ehrenfeucht, H. Toruńczyk, Jan Mycielski, Karol Borsuk, Stanley P. Franklin, Kiiti Morita and Mikhail Khovanov.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact