Compositio Mathematica

2.6k papers and 35.6k indexed citations

About

The 2.6k papers published in Compositio Mathematica in the last decades have received a total of 35.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Compositio Mathematica usually cover Geometry and Topology (1.9k papers), Mathematical Physics (1.5k papers) and Algebra and Number Theory (847 papers) specifically the topics of Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (1.2k papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (910 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (419 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Compositio Mathematica are Steven L. Kleiman, J. L. Waldspurger, N. Spaltenstein, Louis Nirenberg, Robert V. Kohn, Robert Kottwitz, Luis Caffarelli, W. Casselman, Stephen Rallis and B. L. J. Braaksma.

In The Last Decade

Compositio Mathematica

2.3k papers receiving 28.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Compositio Mathematica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Compositio Mathematica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Compositio Mathematica.

Countries where authors publish in Compositio Mathematica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Compositio Mathematica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Compositio Mathematica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Compositio Mathematica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026