Hannah O’Keefe
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 10%
- Frailty in Older Adults
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
-
- Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Papers in
-
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 3
- Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies 2
-
- Metabolism and Genetic Disorders 3
- Co-authors
- Barbara Hanratty (4 shared papers)Dawn Craig (5 shared papers)Quentin M. Anstee (1 shared paper)Helen Jarvis (1 shared paper)Daniel Stow (1 shared paper)Catherine Richmond (3 shared papers)Joanna L. Elson (3 shared papers)Phillip Lord (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Health Technology Assessment (4 papers)BMJ Open (2 papers)Research Synthesis Methods (2 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Journal of Molecular Evolution (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth AfricaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Hannah O’Keefe
14 papers receiving 170 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 21
- Clinical Biochemistry 17
- Physiology 38
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 23
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 20
Countries citing papers authored by Hannah O’Keefe
This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah O’Keefe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah O’Keefe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah O’Keefe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah O’Keefe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah O’Keefe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah O’Keefe. The network helps show where Hannah O’Keefe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hannah O’Keefe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 40 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 27 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 0 |
About Hannah O’Keefe
Hannah O’Keefe is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry, Physiology, Genetics and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 18 papers that have together received 174 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (2 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (2 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (2 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (21 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (17 citations), Physiology (38 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (23 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (20 citations). Hannah O’Keefe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Hanratty, Dawn Craig, Quentin M. Anstee, Helen Jarvis, Daniel Stow, Catherine Richmond, Joanna L. Elson, Phillip Lord, Rachel Queen and Fiona Beyer. Their work appears in journals such as Health Technology Assessment, BMJ Open, Research Synthesis Methods, Scientific Reports and Journal of Molecular Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.