E. M. Cullen

985 citations
15 papers · 808 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

E. M. Cullen

13 papers receiving 779 citations

Peers

E. M. Cullen
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Insect Science 592
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 278
  • Plant Science 441
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 28
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 18
Replace Ron Cherry with:
Ron Cherry United States
Tom W. Pope United Kingdom
İmtiaz Ahmad Pakistan
Bruce D. Potter United States
Eileen Cullen United States
Casey D. Butler United States
Jianhua Mo Australia
Clarissa R. Mathews United States
Mun Il Ryoo South Korea
Hervé Gryta France
E. M. Cullen relative to Ron Cherry United States Ron Cherry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Ron Cherry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. M. Cullen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. M. Cullen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. M. Cullen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. M. Cullen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. M. Cullen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. M. Cullen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. M. Cullen. The network helps show where E. M. Cullen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. M. Cullen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. M. Cullen Line = papers co-authored together E. M. Cullen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2007291
2 2007231
3 200262
4 197156
5 201453
6 200825
7 200523
8 200719
9 200019
10 201716
11 20247
12 20235
13 20011
14 20230
15 20240

About E. M. Cullen

E. M. Cullen is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 808 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (5 papers), Hemiptera Insect Studies (3 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (2 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (2 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers), Potato Plant Research (1 paper), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (592 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (278 citations), Plant Science (441 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (28 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (18 citations). E. M. Cullen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Brian McCornack, Bruce D. Potter, Erin W. Hodgson, Kevin D. Johnson, Christina DiFonzo, David W. Ragsdale, Ian V MacRae, Thomas E. Hunt, Phillip Glogoza and Matt O'Neal. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Entomology, Nutrients, Journal of Applied Entomology, Journal of Insects as Food and Feed and Agronomy Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact