H. G. Peer

472 citations
25 papers · 307 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

H. G. Peer

24 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers

H. G. Peer
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 96
  • Sensory Systems 27
  • Spectroscopy 72
  • Organic Chemistry 123
  • Biomedical Engineering 64
Replace James M. Schlatter with:
James M. Schlatter United States
Arthur H. Goldkamp
Markus Gautschi Switzerland
M.J. Saxby United Kingdom
Felix Flachsmann Switzerland
Janina Nowakowska United States
Ann Cantrell United Kingdom
Lumír Macholán Czechia
Eisuke Takahisa Japan
Andrew A. Vaughan United Kingdom
H. G. Peer relative to James M. Schlatter United States James M. Schlatter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
James M. Schlatter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. G. Peer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. G. Peer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. G. Peer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. G. Peer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. G. Peer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. G. Peer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. G. Peer. The network helps show where H. G. Peer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside H. G. Peer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. G. Peer Line = papers co-authored together H. G. Peer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195931
2 197230
3 196027
4 198522
5 196819
6 197817
7 197917
8 198717
9 197015
10 197515
11 198514
12 196214
13 196814
14 197210
15 19599
16 19839
17 19719
18 19714
19 19673
20 19833

About H. G. Peer

H. G. Peer is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Nutrition and Dietetics, Spectroscopy, Molecular Biology and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 25 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (8 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (5 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (4 papers), Synthesis of Organic Compounds (3 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (3 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (3 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (96 citations), Sensory Systems (27 citations), Spectroscopy (72 citations), Organic Chemistry (123 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (64 citations). H. G. Peer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include H. van der Wel, S.B. Tjan, Johannes Heidema and G. de Vries. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Senses, Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas, Tetrahedron, European Food Research and Technology and Food Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact