H. Büscher

643 citations
12 papers · 549 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

H. Büscher

12 papers receiving 527 citations

Peers

H. Büscher
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Materials Chemistry 341
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 306
  • Biomedical Engineering 191
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 131
  • Mechanics of Materials 81
Replace J. A. McCaulley with:
J. A. McCaulley United States
William J. Tropf United States
Mark Gesley United States
A. A. Fridman Russia
Sang K. Chung United States
G. D. Holah United Kingdom
Tsuyoshi Fukuzawa Japan
Carl D. Scott United States
H. Maier Germany
C. Courteille France
H. Büscher relative to J. A. McCaulley United States J. A. McCaulley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
J. A. McCaulley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Büscher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Büscher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Büscher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Büscher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Büscher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Büscher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Büscher. The network helps show where H. Büscher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside H. Büscher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Büscher Line = papers co-authored together H. Büscher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1996374
2 196599
3 197731
4 197913
5 197611
6 19716
7 19883
8 19713
9 19683
10 19933
11 19712
12 19661

About H. Büscher

H. Büscher is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atmospheric Science, Spectroscopy, Aerospace Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 549 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (3 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (2 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (2 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (1 paper), Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (1 paper), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (1 paper) and Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (341 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (306 citations), Biomedical Engineering (191 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (131 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (81 citations). H. Büscher has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and China. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Ludwig, Kaiming Zhang, Claus Falter, Xide Xie, Jian Zi, E. Damon, William F. Kolbe, B. Leskovar, J.N. Murrell and A. J. Stace. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Physics Letters A, Molecular Physics, Physical Review Letters and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact