Mark Gesley

577 citations
42 papers · 460 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Gesley

39 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

Mark Gesley
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Structural Biology 27
  • Condensed Matter Physics 149
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 87
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 130
  • Biomedical Engineering 157
Replace William A. Friday with:
William A. Friday United States
K. Shirasawa Japan
T. Shitara United Kingdom
Eizo Miyauchi Japan
Marcy Stutzman United States
J. L. Shaw United States
E. Wikborg Sweden
Kevin Matney United States
D. Grigoriev Germany
Takashi Imazono Japan
Mark Gesley relative to William A. Friday United States William A. Friday's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
William A. Friday · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Gesley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Gesley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Gesley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Gesley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Gesley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Gesley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Gesley. The network helps show where Mark Gesley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Gesley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Gesley Line = papers co-authored together Mark Gesley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198489
2 198183
3 198950
4 198535
5 198822
6 200421
7 200418
8 198213
9 19919
10 19888
11 19897
12 19927
13 19916
14 19886
15 20026
16 19856
17 20025
18 19865
19 19935
20 20035

About Mark Gesley

Mark Gesley is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advancements in Photolithography Techniques (24 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (19 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (10 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (4 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (4 papers), Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques (4 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (27 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (149 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (87 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (130 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (157 citations). Mark Gesley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and Canada. Frequent co-authors include L. W. Swanson, P.R. Davis, G. A. Schwind, R. Viswanathan, A. D. Wilson, Juan R. Maldonado, P. Pianetta, Ming L. Yu, Scott A. Chambers and M. A. McCord. Their work appears in journals such as Surface Science, Review of Scientific Instruments, Journal of Applied Physics, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics and Applied Surface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact