Greg Myers

4.0k citations
69 papers · 2.1k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Greg Myers

65 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Greg Myers
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Language and Linguistics 728
  • Literature and Literary Theory 752
  • Linguistics and Language 168
  • Communication 201
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 298
Replace Martin Melaver with:
Martin Melaver
Lester Faigley United States
John Trimbur United States
Charles Bally France
Brian Paltridge Australia
Andrea A. Lunsford United States
Vijay K. Bhatia Hong Kong
Anne Warfield Rawls United States
Theresa Lillis United Kingdom
Ruth Finnegan United Kingdom
Greg Myers relative to Martin Melaver Martin Melaver's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Martin Melaver · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Greg Myers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Greg Myers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg Myers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg Myers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Greg Myers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg Myers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg Myers. The network helps show where Greg Myers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Greg Myers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Greg Myers Line = papers co-authored together Greg Myers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989206
2 2003162
3 2005158
4 1998154
5 1985122
6 1985111
7 1995110
8 199883
9 199971
10 199167
11 199263
12 200460
13 198858
14 199956
15 200654
16 199550
17 201047
18 201242
19 199633
20
Discourse of Blogs and Wikis
201026

About Greg Myers

Greg Myers is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (18 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (16 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (9 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (8 papers), Digital Communication and Language (6 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (6 papers), Language and cultural evolution (4 papers) and Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (728 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (752 citations), Linguistics and Language (168 citations), Communication (201 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (298 citations). Greg Myers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ghana and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Carter, Phil Macnaghten, Sofia Lampropoulou, Steven R. Harris, Deirdre Martin, Mary R. Lea, Dávid Barton, Karin Tusting, Roy Pea and Angela Creese. Their work appears in journals such as Social Studies of Science, Written Communication, Applied Linguistics, Language in Society and College Composition and Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact