Graham Wright

40 papers receiving 680 citations

Peers

Graham Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Health Information Management 252
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 30
  • Medical Terminology 4
  • Health Informatics 19
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 9
Replace Alexander Hoerbst with:
Alexander Hoerbst Austria
Thomas R. Yackel United States
Michael C. Hoaglin United States
Binyam Tilahun Ethiopia
Hajar Mozaffar United Kingdom
Matthew F. Burke United States
Mehrdad Farzandipour Iran
Pirkko Nykänen Finland
Kenneth P. Guappone United States
Jason S. Shapiro United States
Graham Wright relative to Alexander Hoerbst Austria Alexander Hoerbst's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Alexander Hoerbst · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Graham Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Wright. The network helps show where Graham Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Graham Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Graham Wright Line = papers co-authored together Graham Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010224
2 2020160
3 199851
4 201436
5 201729
6 200629
7 200528
8 201524
9 201522
10 201313
11 201012
12 201512
13
Open source and healthcare in Europe - time to put leading edge ideas into practice.
20098
14
eXtreme Programming In A Hostile Environment
20026
15 20115
16 20115
17 20145
18 20175
19 20134
20 20154

About Graham Wright

Graham Wright is a scholar working on Health Information Management, General Health Professions, Molecular Biology, Education and Computer Science Applications, having authored 45 papers that have together received 714 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (15 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (5 papers), Medical Coding and Health Information (5 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (4 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (3 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers) and Open Source Software Innovations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (252 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (30 citations), Medical Terminology (4 citations), Health Informatics (19 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (9 citations). Graham Wright has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sabine Koch, Aboozar Eghdam, Nadia Davoody, Stephen Flowerday, Elske Ammenwerth, William Hersh, Reinhold Haux, J. Mantas, K C Lun and George Demiris. Their work appears in journals such as Yearbook of Medical Informatics, African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine, Methods of Information in Medicine, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Life.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact