Stephen Flowerday

2.0k citations
97 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Flowerday

92 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Stephen Flowerday
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Information Systems 599
  • Health Information Management 86
  • Information Systems and Management 121
  • Management Information Systems 126
  • Signal Processing 127
Replace David Lizcano with:
David Lizcano Spain
Marlien Herselman South Africa
Anat Hovav South Korea
Charles Zhechao Liu United States
Adéle Botha South Africa
Maslin Masrom Malaysia
Alex Voß United Kingdom
Amit V. Deokar United States
Shahriar Mohammadi Iran
Golam Sorwar Australia
Stephen Flowerday relative to David Lizcano Spain David Lizcano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
David Lizcano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Flowerday

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Flowerday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Flowerday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Flowerday more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Flowerday

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Flowerday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Flowerday. The network helps show where Stephen Flowerday may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Flowerday, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Flowerday Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Flowerday links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020160
2 2020101
3 201655
4 201448
5 200647
6 201342
7 200540
8 201137
9 201834
10 200529
11 202027
12 201422
13 202022
14 202022
15 202221
16 202019
17 201618
18 201618
19 201617
20 202317

About Stephen Flowerday

Stephen Flowerday is a scholar working on Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Management Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications and Strategy and Management, having authored 97 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Information and Cyber Security (26 papers), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (26 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (21 papers), Spam and Phishing Detection (9 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (9 papers), User Authentication and Security Systems (7 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (7 papers) and Smart Cities and Technologies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems (599 citations), Health Information Management (86 citations), Information Systems and Management (121 citations), Management Information Systems (126 citations) and Signal Processing (127 citations). Stephen Flowerday has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rossouw von Solms, Liezel Cilliers, Graham Wright, Sabine Koch, Nadia Davoody, Aboozar Eghdam, Karen Renaud, Hennie Kruger, Merrill Warkentin and Steven Furnell. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Security, Journal of Information Security and Applications, Life, Information & Management and Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact