Grace C. Lin

20 papers receiving 449 citations

Peers

Grace C. Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 88
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 96
  • Computer Science Applications 27
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 68
  • Applied Psychology 19
Replace Reid Laughlin Skeel with:
Reid Laughlin Skeel United States
Andrea Tartaro United States
Ivana Bianchi Italy
María Ángeles González Spain
Rhonda Douglas Brown United States
Michael S. Vendetti United States
Jennifer Schmidt Germany
Joseph Peter Salisbury United States
Minyue Zhang China
Kristian Lange Germany
Grace C. Lin relative to Reid Laughlin Skeel United States Reid Laughlin Skeel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×23×
Reid Laughlin Skeel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grace C. Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grace C. Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grace C. Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grace C. Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grace C. Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grace C. Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grace C. Lin. The network helps show where Grace C. Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Grace C. Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Grace C. Lin Line = papers co-authored together Grace C. Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000130
2 200880
3 201639
4 201936
5 202326
6 201424
7 201823
8 202320
9 202212
10 202212
11 202212
12 20238
13 20258
14 20196
15 20216
16 20235
17 20244
18 20243
19 20243
20 20211

About Grace C. Lin

Grace C. Lin is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience and Statistics and Probability, having authored 22 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (3 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (3 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers) and AI in Service Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (88 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (96 citations), Computer Science Applications (27 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (68 citations) and Applied Psychology (19 citations). Grace C. Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Kirsten Prüfer, Julia Bársony, Áttila Rácz, Karen E. Adolph, Stephanie M. Reich, Carrie R. McDonald, Susanne M. Jaeggi, Joseph Kay, Kelly M. Leyden and Yoon Jeon Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Brain and Language, Contemporary Educational Psychology, Reading and Writing and British Journal of Educational Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact