Grace C. Lin

17 papers receiving 379 citations

Peers

Grace C. Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 69
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 105
  • Human-Computer Interaction 25
  • Computer Science Applications 18
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 60
Replace Kelly Dickerson with:
Kelly Dickerson United States
Patrícia Martinková Czechia
Michael S. Vendetti United States
Karin M. Butler United States
Marie Carroll Australia
Krisztina Tóth Hungary
Gabrielle Cliff Hodges United Kingdom
Kristian Lange Germany
M. O. Scase United Kingdom
Kyoung Whan Choe United States
Grace C. Lin relative to Kelly Dickerson United States Kelly Dickerson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kelly Dickerson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grace C. Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grace C. Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grace C. Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grace C. Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grace C. Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grace C. Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grace C. Lin. The network helps show where Grace C. Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Grace C. Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Grace C. Lin Line = papers co-authored together Grace C. Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2000116
2 200877
3 201637
4 201933
5 201423
6 201817
7 202316
8 202314
9 202210
10 20229
11 20237
12 20226
13 20196
14 20215
15 20233
16 20243
17 20241
18 20240
19
The Roles of Language and Executive Function on Early Mathematics Among Emergent Bilinguals
20180

About Grace C. Lin

Grace C. Lin is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistics and Probability and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 19 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (3 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers) and Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (69 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (105 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (25 citations), Computer Science Applications (18 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (60 citations). Grace C. Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Julia Bársony, Kirsten Prüfer, Áttila Rácz, Karen E. Adolph, Joseph Kay, Stephanie M. Reich, Kelly M. Leyden, Susanne M. Jaeggi, Carrie R. McDonald and Geetha B. Ramani. Their work appears in journals such as Mind Brain and Education, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Brain and Language and IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact