Grace C. Lin

18 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

Grace C. Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 74
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 91
  • Human-Computer Interaction 23
  • Applied Psychology 18
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 58
Replace Joshua R. Steinerman with:
Joshua R. Steinerman United States
Kelly Dickerson United States
María Ángeles González Spain
Krisztina Tóth Hungary
Michael S. Vendetti United States
Kristian Lange Germany
Midori Ban Japan
Chris Street United States
John E. Kiat United States
M. O. Scase United Kingdom
Grace C. Lin relative to Joshua R. Steinerman United States Joshua R. Steinerman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Joshua R. Steinerman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grace C. Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grace C. Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grace C. Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grace C. Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grace C. Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grace C. Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grace C. Lin. The network helps show where Grace C. Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Grace C. Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Grace C. Lin Line = papers co-authored together Grace C. Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000116
2 200877
3 201638
4 201935
5 201424
6 202319
7 201819
8 202315
9 202210
10 202210
11 20228
12 20238
13 20196
14 20216
15 20235
16 20243
17 20242
18 20241
19 20250
20 20250

About Grace C. Lin

Grace C. Lin is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Education and Statistics and Probability, having authored 21 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (3 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (3 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers) and AI in Service Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (74 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (91 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (23 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (58 citations). Grace C. Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Julia Bársony, Áttila Rácz, Kirsten Prüfer, Karen E. Adolph, Carrie R. McDonald, Kelly M. Leyden, Joseph Kay, Stephanie M. Reich, Susanne M. Jaeggi and Geetha B. Ramani. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, Information and Learning Sciences, Mind Brain and Education, interactions and Developmental Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact