Gillian Pepper

1.5k citations
33 papers · 836 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Gillian Pepper

31 papers receiving 817 citations

Peers

Gillian Pepper
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • General Decision Sciences 77
  • Applied Psychology 110
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 244
  • Aging 31
  • Health 81
Replace Erika M. Manczak with:
Erika M. Manczak United States
Daniel M. Haybron United States
Sooyeon Sung United States
Richard E. Mattson United States
Andrew Edward White United States
Leslie Sue Lieberman United States
Michael Biehl United States
Geneva Vásquez United States
Ethan S. Young United States
Carmen E. Lefevre United Kingdom
Gillian Pepper relative to Erika M. Manczak United States Erika M. Manczak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Erika M. Manczak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gillian Pepper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gillian Pepper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gillian Pepper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gillian Pepper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gillian Pepper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gillian Pepper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gillian Pepper. The network helps show where Gillian Pepper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gillian Pepper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gillian Pepper Line = papers co-authored together Gillian Pepper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017262
2 201868
3 200661
4 201457
5 201846
6 201342
7 201634
8 201433
9 201733
10 201427
11 202125
12 202124
13 201421
14 202319
15 201718
16 202117
17 20186
18 20186
19 20235
20 20234

About Gillian Pepper

Gillian Pepper is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 33 papers that have together received 836 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (4 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (4 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (4 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (77 citations), Applied Psychology (110 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (244 citations), Aging (31 citations) and Health (81 citations). Gillian Pepper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Nettle, Melissa Bateson, S. Craig Roberts, Richard D. Brown, Adam Bulley, Lynne Coventry, Kari Britt Schroeder, Sandra Virgo, David A. Coall and Lisa McAllister. Their work appears in journals such as PeerJ, Evolution and Human Behavior, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Appetite and Annals of Behavioral Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact