Richard E. Mattson

43 papers receiving 714 citations

Peers

Richard E. Mattson
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • General Decision Sciences 84
  • Applied Psychology 123
  • Clinical Psychology 315
  • Social Psychology 243
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 141
Replace Grace Icenogle with:
Grace Icenogle United States
Marya Gwadz United States
Jorien van Hoorn Netherlands
Steven R. Lawyer United States
Dave Clarke New Zealand
Ivy N. Defoe Netherlands
Tila Pronk Netherlands
Cinnamon L. Danube United States
Melanie Skaggs Sheldon United States
Jack L. Andrews United Kingdom
Richard E. Mattson relative to Grace Icenogle United States Grace Icenogle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Grace Icenogle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard E. Mattson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard E. Mattson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard E. Mattson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard E. Mattson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard E. Mattson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard E. Mattson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard E. Mattson. The network helps show where Richard E. Mattson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard E. Mattson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard E. Mattson Line = papers co-authored together Richard E. Mattson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006114
2 2007108
3 200674
4 201270
5 198960
6 200750
7 201533
8 200729
9 201122
10 201721
11 201921
12 201017
13 200713
14 202011
15 201910
16 20239
17 20099
18 20228
19 20218
20 20227

About Richard E. Mattson

Richard E. Mattson is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health and Gender Studies, having authored 46 papers that have together received 754 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (13 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (9 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (9 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (4 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (84 citations), Applied Psychology (123 citations), Clinical Psychology (315 citations), Social Psychology (243 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (141 citations). Richard E. Mattson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Donovick, Bryan A. Castelda, Emily J. Anderson, James MacKillop, Matthew D. Johnson, James MacKillop, Frank D. Fincham, Ronald D. Rogge, Ana M. Franco‐Watkins and Ashton M. Lofgreen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Personal Relationships and Psychology of Addictive Behaviors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact