Georges C.M. Evers

26 papers receiving 906 citations

Peers

Georges C.M. Evers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Transplantation 159
  • Family Practice 77
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 17
  • Nephrology 79
  • Sensory Systems 43
Replace Mary E. Lough with:
Mary E. Lough United States
Stéphanie Gentile France
Dorothy M. Lanuza United States
Jeanne Salyer United States
Jill M. Gelow United States
Li‐Chueh Weng Taiwan
David H. Hull United States
Nand K. Wadhwa United States
Mona Newsome Wicks United States
Debera Palmeri United States
Georges C.M. Evers relative to Mary E. Lough United States Mary E. Lough's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×43×
Mary E. Lough · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Georges C.M. Evers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Georges C.M. Evers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Georges C.M. Evers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Georges C.M. Evers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Georges C.M. Evers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Georges C.M. Evers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Georges C.M. Evers. The network helps show where Georges C.M. Evers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Georges C.M. Evers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Georges C.M. Evers Line = papers co-authored together Georges C.M. Evers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004193
2 2004154
3 2002102
4 200398
5 200179
6 199467
7 200359
8 199631
9 200429
10 200224
11 200420
12 200017
13 199510
14 20009
15 20028
16 20057
17 20026
18 20006
19 20045
20 20034

About Georges C.M. Evers

Georges C.M. Evers is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Pharmacy, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 28 papers that have together received 941 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (3 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (2 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (2 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers), Pregnancy and Medication Impact (2 papers), Nursing care and research (2 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (159 citations), Family Practice (77 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (17 citations), Nephrology (79 citations) and Sensory Systems (43 citations). Georges C.M. Evers has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bart Maes, HANS VLAMINCK, Evelyne Lerut, Yves F. Ch. Vanrenterghem, Boudewijn Van Damme, Geert N. Verbeke, Steven Vanderschueren, Michel Delforge, K. Nijs and Ivo L. Abraham. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Nursing Studies, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Journal of Pediatric Urology and Supportive Care in Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact