G. Prota
Impact in
- Cell Biology top 1%
- melanin and skin pigmentation
- Dermatology top 1%
- Skin Protection and Aging
Papers in
- Cell Biology 35
- melanin and skin pigmentation 35
-
- Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds 6
- Co-authors
- Marco d’Ischia (18 shared papers)Shosuke Ito (4 shared papers)Giovanna Misuraca (14 shared papers)Anna Palumbo (11 shared papers)Mario Piattelli (2 shared papers)Luigi Minale (2 shared papers)Alessandra Napolitano (11 shared papers)Francesco Chioccara (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (13 papers)Tetrahedron (11 papers)Melanoma Research (10 papers)Tetrahedron Letters (7 papers)Archives of Dermatological Research (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalyFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
G. Prota
88 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Cell Biology 1.1k
- Dermatology 455
- Biochemistry 215
- Nutrition and Dietetics 510
- Sensory Systems 128
Countries citing papers authored by G. Prota
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Prota's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Prota with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Prota more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Prota
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Prota. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Prota. The network helps show where G. Prota may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Prota, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1977 | 181 | |
| 2 | 1976 | 150 | |
| 3 | 1987 | 142 | |
| 4 | 1982 | 122 | |
| 5 | 1964 | 104 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 100 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 96 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 64 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 62 | |
| 10 | 1965 | 58 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 56 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 52 | |
| 13 | 1980 | 51 | |
| 14 | 1970 | 51 | |
| 15 | 1982 | 47 | |
| 16 | 1976 | 43 | |
| 17 | 1985 | 43 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 38 | |
| 19 | Some new aspects of eumelanin chemistry. | 1988 | 31 |
| 20 | 1988 | 30 |
About G. Prota
G. Prota is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Dermatology, having authored 89 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include melanin and skin pigmentation (35 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (16 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (14 papers), Phenothiazines and Benzothiazines Synthesis and Activities (7 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (7 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (6 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (6 papers) and bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (1.1k citations), Dermatology (455 citations), Biochemistry (215 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (510 citations) and Sensory Systems (128 citations). G. Prota has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marco d’Ischia, Shosuke Ito, Giovanna Misuraca, Anna Palumbo, Mario Piattelli, Luigi Minale, Alessandra Napolitano, Francesco Chioccara, Lucio Cariello and E. Rosengren. Their work appears in journals such as Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Tetrahedron, Melanoma Research, Tetrahedron Letters and Archives of Dermatological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.