T.T. Tchen

112 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

T.T. Tchen
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Cell Biology 859
  • Biochemistry 367
  • Molecular Biology 1.8k
  • Physiology 107
  • Pharmacology 167
Replace T Mori with:
T Mori Japan
E.S. Kempner United States
C.J. Masters Australia
C S Rubin United States
Eric G. Ball United States
Kerry T. Yasunobu United States
Roger S. Holmes Australia
Roser Gonzàlez‐Duarte Spain
Abraham Rosenberg United States
K. A. Munday United Kingdom
T.T. Tchen relative to T Mori Japan T Mori's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
T Mori · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T.T. Tchen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T.T. Tchen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T.T. Tchen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T.T. Tchen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T.T. Tchen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T.T. Tchen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T.T. Tchen. The network helps show where T.T. Tchen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T.T. Tchen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T.T. Tchen Line = papers co-authored together T.T. Tchen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 113 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979247
2 1968130
3 1961123
4 1957122
5 1958110
6 195581
7 197576
8 195776
9 195575
10 198662
11 198660
12 197255
13 196254
14 195854
15 195550
16 195550
17 195649
18 196047
19 195747
20 197444

About T.T. Tchen

T.T. Tchen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biochemistry and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 113 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include melanin and skin pigmentation (22 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (12 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (10 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (8 papers), Polyamine Metabolism and Applications (8 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (7 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (7 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (859 citations), Biochemistry (367 citations), Molecular Biology (1.8k citations), Physiology (107 citations) and Pharmacology (167 citations). T.T. Tchen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and China. Frequent co-authors include John D. Taylor, George Constantopoulos, Konrad E. Bloch, Birgit Vennesland, William Turner, Thomas J. Lynch, Douglas R. Pfeiffer, John D. Taylor, Jiro Matsumoto and Konrad Bloch. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Experimental Zoology and Biochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact