Countries where authors publish in Melanoma Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Melanoma Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Melanoma Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanoma Research more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Melanoma Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Melanoma Research.
About Melanoma Research
The 3.0k papers published in Melanoma Research in the last decades have received a total of 55.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Melanoma Research usually cover Oncology (1.8k papers), Immunology and Allergy (276 papers), Dermatology (307 papers), Immunology (724 papers) and Ophthalmology (193 papers) specifically the topics of Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (1.3k papers), Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (644 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (570 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (286 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (286 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (266 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (210 papers) and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (190 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Melanoma Research are Bruce K. Armstrong, Claus Garbe, John F. Thompson, Anne Kricker, Vincent J. Hearing, Richard A. Sturm, Peter Hersey, Giuseppe Prota, Agop Y. Bedikian and Thomas Eigentler.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.