Frederick Cassidy

6.1k citations
79 papers · 4.2k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick Cassidy

76 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Frederick Cassidy
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 2.1k
  • Biological Psychiatry 313
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 363
  • Clinical Psychology 603
  • Pharmacology 345
Replace Robert M. Post with:
Robert M. Post United States
Arnold J. Friedhoff United States
David M. Shaw United Kingdom
Ronit Weizman Israel
Andrew L. Stoll United States
B. Müller‐Oerlinghausen Germany
George S. Zubenko United States
Herbert Y. Meltzer United States
Rif S. El‐Mallakh United States
Beny Lafer Brazil
Frederick Cassidy relative to Robert M. Post United States Robert M. Post's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Robert M. Post · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Cassidy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Cassidy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Cassidy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Cassidy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Cassidy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Cassidy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Cassidy. The network helps show where Frederick Cassidy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Cassidy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Cassidy Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Cassidy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001310
2 1999253
3 2002247
4 1998240
5 2014237
6 2007222
7 1998167
8 1986157
9 2009137
10 2005135
11 2015111
12 200195
13 201589
14 200283
15 196682
16 199279
17 200871
18 200465
19 200464
20 199262

About Frederick Cassidy

Frederick Cassidy is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 79 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (32 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (5 papers), Synthesis of Organic Compounds (5 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (2.1k citations), Biological Psychiatry (313 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (363 citations), Clinical Psychology (603 citations) and Pharmacology (345 citations). Frederick Cassidy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Bernard J. Carroll, Eileen P. Ahearn, Kousik Krishnan, William H. Wilson, John L. Beyer, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, Lakshmi N. Yatham, Geoffrey Stemp, John Evans and Johannes D. Veldhuis. Their work appears in journals such as Bipolar Disorders, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Journal of Affective Disorders and Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact