Martha E. Payne

106 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Peers

Martha E. Payne
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Biological Psychiatry 500
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 412
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.5k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.4k
  • Neurology 441
Replace Warren D. Taylor with:
Warren D. Taylor United States
Douglas R. McQuoid United States
Poul Videbech Denmark
K. Ranga Krishnan United States
Ronald Bottlender Germany
Gary S. Figiel United States
Molly E. Zimmerman United States
Roderick K. Mahurin United States
Jan Cees de Groot Netherlands
Siobhan M. White United States
Martha E. Payne relative to Warren D. Taylor United States Warren D. Taylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Warren D. Taylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Martha E. Payne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Martha E. Payne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martha E. Payne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martha E. Payne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Martha E. Payne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martha E. Payne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martha E. Payne. The network helps show where Martha E. Payne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Martha E. Payne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Martha E. Payne Line = papers co-authored together Martha E. Payne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008399
2 2000334
3 2006246
4 2004202
5 2015196
6 2003193
7 2003188
8 2000186
9 2012174
10 2005139
11 2001136
12 2005135
13 1994117
14 2001113
15 2003110
16 2010106
17 2002106
18 2013105
19 200298
20 200598

About Martha E. Payne

Martha E. Payne is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 107 papers that have together received 6.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (17 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (14 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (14 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (7 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (6 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (5 papers) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (500 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (412 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.5k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations) and Neurology (441 citations). Martha E. Payne has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include James R. MacFall, David C. Steffens, Warren D. Taylor, Douglas R. McQuoid, Kousik Krishnan, James M. Provenzale, K. Ranga Krishnan, Ki Woong Kim, Christopher E. Byrum and Daniel L. Greenberg. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging and International Psychogeriatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact