Frederic Damen

633 citations
8 papers · 516 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Frederic Damen

7 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

Frederic Damen
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 286
  • Social Psychology 319
  • Applied Psychology 34
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 38
  • Sociology and Political Science 209
Replace Adrian H. Pitariu with:
Adrian H. Pitariu Canada
Qiongjing Hu China
Marc Solga Germany
John N. Harris United States
Merlijn Venus Netherlands
Andrew J. Vinchur United States
L. Melita Prati United States
Tina Urbach Germany
Sandra Kiffin‐Petersen Australia
Jianghua Mao China
Frederic Damen relative to Adrian H. Pitariu Canada Adrian H. Pitariu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Adrian H. Pitariu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederic Damen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederic Damen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederic Damen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederic Damen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederic Damen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederic Damen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederic Damen. The network helps show where Frederic Damen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Frederic Damen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederic Damen Line = papers co-authored together Frederic Damen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2009295
2 200892
3 200865
4
Taking the Lead; The Role of Affect in Leadership Effectiveness
200337
5 200819
6 20086
7
Understanding the effects of leader emotions on team performance. The effectiveness of angry versus happy leaders depends on followers' cognitive style
20062
8 20040

About Frederic Damen

Frederic Damen is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation, Education and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (2 papers), Management Theory and Practice (2 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (1 paper), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (1 paper) and Organizational Management and Leadership (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (286 citations), Social Psychology (319 citations), Applied Psychology (34 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (38 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (209 citations). Frederic Damen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daan van Knippenberg, Barbara van Knippenberg, Gerben A. van Kleef, Bianca Beersma and Astrid C. Homan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Academy of Management Journal, Gedrag & Organisatie, Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks and Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact