Fiona Middle

12 papers receiving 466 citations

Peers

Fiona Middle
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 221
  • Biological Psychiatry 17
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 112
  • Genetics 146
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 82
Replace Timothy L. Gasperoni with:
Timothy L. Gasperoni United States
Jennifer Chellis United States
Carrie Smiley United States
N. Leela Rau United States
Piero Venturi Italy
Denis Cliche Canada
Denise Y. Rollins United States
Sally Hyde United Kingdom
Nick Craddock United Kingdom
Aura Frizzati United Kingdom
Fiona Middle relative to Timothy L. Gasperoni United States Timothy L. Gasperoni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Timothy L. Gasperoni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fiona Middle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Middle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Middle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Middle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona Middle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Middle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Middle. The network helps show where Fiona Middle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fiona Middle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fiona Middle Line = papers co-authored together Fiona Middle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2004152
2 200262
3 200160
4 200547
5 200037
6 200031
7 200030
8 199727
9 201016
10 200315
11 200213
12 20002

About Fiona Middle

Fiona Middle is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper) and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (221 citations), Biological Psychiatry (17 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (112 citations), Genetics (146 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (82 citations). Fiona Middle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nick J. Craddock, Ian Richard Jones, Corinne L. Lendon, Emma C. Robertson, Michael Gill, Michael Fitzgerald, Ziarih Hawi, Lindsey Kent, Fiona McCandless and Michael Owen. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Genetics, Molecular Psychiatry, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics and The American Journal of Human Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact