Fiona Mathieson

29 papers receiving 741 citations

Peers

Fiona Mathieson
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Pharmacology 410
  • Family Practice 9
  • Occupational Therapy 18
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 57
  • Applied Psychology 19
Replace Aila Järvikoski with:
Aila Järvikoski Finland
Sónia F. Bernardes Portugal
Kristiina Härkäpää Finland
Lívia Maria Bolsoni Brazil
Jihyung Hong United Kingdom
Esther Yakobov Canada
William W. Deardorff United States
Agneta Lindegård Sweden
Elena R. Serrano‐Ibáñez Spain
A.H. Schene Netherlands
Fiona Mathieson relative to Aila Järvikoski Finland Aila Järvikoski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Aila Järvikoski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fiona Mathieson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Mathieson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Mathieson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Mathieson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona Mathieson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Mathieson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Mathieson. The network helps show where Fiona Mathieson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fiona Mathieson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fiona Mathieson Line = papers co-authored together Fiona Mathieson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013207
2 201599
3 201478
4 201477
5 200939
6 201930
7 201430
8 201526
9 201524
10 200722
11 201220
12 201515
13 201810
14 20119
15
Sub-threshold mental health syndromes: finding an alternative to the medication of unhappiness.
20099
16 20178
17 20177
18 20097
19 20226
20
What gets in the way of clinical contact? Student perceptions of barriers to patient contact.
20095

About Fiona Mathieson

Fiona Mathieson is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 31 papers that have together received 758 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (3 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (410 citations), Family Practice (9 citations), Occupational Therapy (18 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (57 citations) and Applied Psychology (19 citations). Fiona Mathieson has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ben Darlow, David Baxter, Meredith Perry, Sarah Dean, Anthony Dowell, Anthony Dowell, James Stanley, Markus Melloh, Jennifer Jordan and Maria Stubbe. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Trials, Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, Family Practice and Applied Health Economics and Health Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact