Fei-Ping Chen
Impact in
- Molecular Medicine top 2%
- Curcumin's Biomedical Applications
- Food Science top 1%
- Proteins in Food Systems
- Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
- Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
- Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
Papers in
-
- Proteins in Food Systems 6
- Polysaccharides Composition and Applications 3
- Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis 2
-
- Curcumin's Biomedical Applications 4
- Co-authors
- Chuan‐He Tang (7 shared papers)LI Bian-sheng (1 shared paper)Shiyi Ou (2 shared papers)Lingling Liu (1 shared paper)Yanteng Xu (1 shared paper)Yuhan Wang (1 shared paper)Zhong Chen (1 shared paper)Ning Zhang (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (3 papers)Food Hydrocolloids (2 papers)Food Research International (1 paper)Journal of Food Processing and Preservation (1 paper)LWT (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- China
In The Last Decade
Fei-Ping Chen
9 papers receiving 876 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Molecular Medicine 181
- Food Science 665
- Biochemistry 60
- Nutrition and Dietetics 144
- Biomaterials 102
Countries citing papers authored by Fei-Ping Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Fei-Ping Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fei-Ping Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fei-Ping Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fei-Ping Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fei-Ping Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fei-Ping Chen. The network helps show where Fei-Ping Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Fei-Ping Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 310 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 169 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 142 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 86 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 54 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 13 |
About Fei-Ping Chen
Fei-Ping Chen is a scholar working on Food Science, Molecular Medicine, Biomaterials, Physiology and Plant Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 884 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Proteins in Food Systems (6 papers), Curcumin's Biomedical Applications (4 papers), Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (3 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (2 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (2 papers), Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging (2 papers), Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis (2 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (181 citations), Food Science (665 citations), Biochemistry (60 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (144 citations) and Biomaterials (102 citations). Fei-Ping Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China. Frequent co-authors include Chuan‐He Tang, LI Bian-sheng, Shiyi Ou, Lingling Liu, Yanteng Xu, Yuhan Wang, Zhong Chen, Ning Zhang, Yulong Chen and Zheng Luo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Food Hydrocolloids, Food Research International, Journal of Food Processing and Preservation and LWT.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.