Evan Baum
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 3
-
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 2
- Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects 2
- Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior 1
- Co-authors
- Yiyun Huang (5 shared papers)Daniel Holden (5 shared papers)Shu-fei Lin (5 shared papers)Sjoerd J. Finnema (3 shared papers)Nabeel Nabulsi (3 shared papers)Richard E. Carson (3 shared papers)Jonas Hannestad (1 shared paper)Ming-Kai Chen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- ACS Chemical Neuroscience (3 papers)Science Translational Medicine (1 paper)Journal of Nuclear Medicine (1 paper)Biology Methods and Protocols (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaBelgium
In The Last Decade
Evan Baum
7 papers receiving 450 citations
Evan Baum's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Biological Psychiatry 32
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 204
- Psychiatry and Mental health 94
- Cognitive Neuroscience 112
- Neurology 39
Countries citing papers authored by Evan Baum
This map shows the geographic impact of Evan Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evan Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evan Baum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Evan Baum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Evan Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Evan Baum. The network helps show where Evan Baum may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Evan Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Imaging synaptic density in the living human brain Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 361 |
| 2 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 7 | 11C-UCB-J as a biomarker for synaptic density - an in vivo/in vitro validation study | 2016 | 1 |
| 8 | 2025 | 0 |
About Evan Baum
Evan Baum is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Surgery, having authored 8 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (2 papers), Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (2 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (1 paper), Biotin and Related Studies (1 paper) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (32 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (204 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (94 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (112 citations) and Neurology (39 citations). Evan Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Yiyun Huang, Daniel Holden, Shu-fei Lin, Sjoerd J. Finnema, Nabeel Nabulsi, Richard E. Carson, Jonas Hannestad, Ming-Kai Chen, Dennis D. Spencer and David Matuskey. Their work appears in journals such as ACS Chemical Neuroscience, Science Translational Medicine, Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology Methods and Protocols.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.