Evan Baum

12 papers receiving 585 citations

Evan Baum's Hit Papers

Imaging synaptic density in the living human brain 2016 · 429 citations
4290+3+6Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Evan Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Biological Psychiatry 33
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 203
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 92
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 100
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 104
Replace Naoto Omata with:
Naoto Omata Japan
Per Stenkrona Sweden
Yasunori Sano Japan
Manami Takahashi Japan
Enise Irem Incesoy Germany
Kenji Tagai Japan
Renee J. Gordon New Zealand
Bingzhi Shi United States
Tomohisa Nagashima Japan
Ricky R. Savjani United States
Evan Baum relative to Naoto Omata Japan Naoto Omata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Naoto Omata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Evan Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Evan Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evan Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evan Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Evan Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Evan Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Evan Baum. The network helps show where Evan Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Evan Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Evan Baum Line = papers co-authored together Evan Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1
Imaging synaptic density in the living human brain
Hit paper breakdown →
2016429
2 202039
3 200635
4 200634
5 201723
6 202321
7 201914
8 202014
9 20253
10
11C-UCB-J as a biomarker for synaptic density - an in vivo/in vitro validation study
20162
11 20051
12 20051
13 20260

About Evan Baum

Evan Baum is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology, Political Science and International Relations and Education, having authored 13 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Higher Education Governance and Development (3 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (3 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (2 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers) and Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (33 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (203 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (92 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (100 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (104 citations). Evan Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Yiyun Henry Huang, Shu-fei Lin, Daniel Holden, Richard E. Carson, Sjoerd J. Finnema, Nabeel Nabulsi, Dennis D. Spencer, Jonas O. Hannestad, Tore Eid and Roni Dhaher. Their work appears in journals such as ACS Chemical Neuroscience, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Research in Higher Education, Review of higher education/˜The œreview of higher education and Science Translational Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact