Biology Methods and Protocols

1.7k citations
289 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
    • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
    • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
    • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Papers in

    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 26
    • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications 26
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 25
    • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques 25
    • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 18
    • RNA modifications and cancer 17
    • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research 18
    • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing 12

Biology Methods and Protocols

226 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Biology Methods and Protocols
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Molecular Biology 850
  • Infectious Diseases 200
  • Cancer Research 161
  • Aging 18
  • Genetics 268
Replace Quantitative Biology with:
Quantitative Biology China
F1000 Biology Reports United States
Berichte aus der medizinischen Informatik und Bioinformatik/Journal of integrative bioinformatics Germany
BioTech United States
Clinical and Molecular Allergy Italy
BMC Pharmacology United States
Frontiers in Biology United States
Emerging Topics in Life Sciences United Kingdom
Journal of Biomolecular Techniques JBT United States
Drug Discovery Today Disease Models United States
Biology Methods and Protocols relative to Quantitative Biology China Quantitative Biology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Quantitative Biology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Biology Methods and Protocols

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biology Methods and Protocols. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biology Methods and Protocols with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biology Methods and Protocols more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Biology Methods and Protocols

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biology Methods and Protocols. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biology Methods and Protocols.

About Biology Methods and Protocols

The 289 papers published in Biology Methods and Protocols in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Biology Methods and Protocols usually cover Molecular Biology (168 papers), Infectious Diseases (37 papers), Modeling and Simulation (8 papers), Biophysics (8 papers) and Cancer Research (20 papers) specifically the topics of RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (26 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (26 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (25 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (25 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (18 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (18 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (17 papers) and SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (12 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biology Methods and Protocols are Robert R. Fitak, Olin Silander, Muhammad Faisal, Nikki E. Freed, Javad Zahiri, Sajjad Janfaza, Babak Khorsand, Maryam Nikkhah, Anna Cuscó and Olga Francino.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact