Eugene Tseng

459 citations
9 papers · 334 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Eugene Tseng

9 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

Eugene Tseng
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 124
  • Physiology 24
  • Molecular Biology 196
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 22
  • Global and Planetary Change 50
Replace Michael P. Hayes with:
Michael P. Hayes United States
Michael T. Griffin United States
Shuiqiao Liu China
J Nishikawa Japan
Carl Sims United States
Xingfeng Liu China
Wen Zheng Germany
Hideo Fukasawa Japan
Fiona M. Mitchell United Kingdom
Eugene Tseng relative to Michael P. Hayes United States Michael P. Hayes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Michael P. Hayes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eugene Tseng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eugene Tseng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugene Tseng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugene Tseng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eugene Tseng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugene Tseng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugene Tseng. The network helps show where Eugene Tseng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eugene Tseng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eugene Tseng Line = papers co-authored together Eugene Tseng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 200983
2 202076
3 200645
4 200440
5 200740
6 200429
7 200610
8 20079
9 20042

About Eugene Tseng

Eugene Tseng is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 9 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (1 paper) and Landfill Environmental Impact Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (124 citations), Physiology (24 citations), Molecular Biology (196 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (22 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (50 citations). Eugene Tseng has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark H. Pausch, Brian Bates, Janet Paulsen, Dianne Kowal, Angela Krämer, Kelsey Foster, David R. Thompson, Riley Duren, Charles E. Miller and Daniel Cusworth. Their work appears in journals such as Assay and Drug Development Technologies, SLAS DISCOVERY, Environmental Research Letters, European Journal of Pharmacology and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact