Flora Jow

969 citations
27 papers · 577 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Flora Jow

27 papers receiving 567 citations

Peers

Flora Jow
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 214
  • Sensory Systems 45
  • Biological Psychiatry 15
  • Molecular Biology 440
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 127
Replace Stanley Nawoschik with:
Stanley Nawoschik United States
Mirko Hechenberger Germany
Giriraj Sahu India
Teddy Grand France
Gábor L. Petheö Hungary
Jinjing Yao China
Sandrine Pouvreau France
Haitao You Canada
Christine A. B. Jollimore Canada
Julien Roussel France
Flora Jow relative to Stanley Nawoschik United States Stanley Nawoschik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Stanley Nawoschik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Flora Jow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Flora Jow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Flora Jow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Flora Jow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Flora Jow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Flora Jow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Flora Jow. The network helps show where Flora Jow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Flora Jow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Flora Jow Line = papers co-authored together Flora Jow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200857
2 200838
3 199038
4 199234
5 198933
6 200831
7 200429
8 200429
9 200426
10 200825
11 199425
12 199922
13 199922
14 201221
15 200020
16 199817
17 200016
18 201115
19 200515
20 199814

About Flora Jow

Flora Jow is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Physiology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 577 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (18 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (15 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers) and GABA and Rice Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (214 citations), Sensory Systems (45 citations), Biological Psychiatry (15 citations), Molecular Biology (440 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (127 citations). Flora Jow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Deborah J. Nelson, Randy Numann, Brian Jow, John Dunlop, KeWei Wang, Angela Krämer, Stephen R. Shorofsky, Mark R. Bowlby, Dianne Kowal and Nathan E. Schoppa. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Membrane Biology, Assay and Drug Development Technologies, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry and Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact